top of page
  • Writer's pictureR.D. Lieberman,Consultant

Terminating an Award if a Size Determination Finds An Awardee "Not Small"

Suppose a size determination ultimately finds a contractor is “not small” but the award has already been made? (This is a distinct possibility given the timing of size protests). What can the agency do at that time? Amaze Tech. LLC, B-419141, Dec. 22, 2020, and the small business regulations explain the options. Termination of the contract is only one avenue. The protester in Amaze alleged in a supplemental protest of a task order award that the awardee, Apogee, was no longer small, and ineligible to receive the task order it had been awarded. However, the Government Accountability Office (“GAO”) in its decision dismissed this protest ground (and denied other grounds) because of the following section of the small business regulations.

(g) Results of an SBA Size Determination.

(1) A contracting officer may award a contract to a protested concern after the SBA Area Office has determined either that the protested concern is an eligible small business or has dismissed all protests against it. If OHA subsequently overturns the Area Office's determination or dismissal, the contracting officer may apply the OHA decision to the procurement in question.

(2) A contracting officer shall not award a contract to a protested concern that the Area Office has determined is not an eligible small business for the procurement in question.

(i) If a contracting officer receives such a determination after contract award, and no OHA appeal has been filed, the contracting officer shall terminate the award.

(ii) If a timely OHA appeal is filed after contract award, the contracting officer must consider whether performance can be suspended until an appellate decision is rendered.

(iii) If OHA affirms the size determination finding the protested concern ineligible, the contracting officer shall either terminate the contract or not exercise the next option.

13 CFR § 121.1009(g).


The regulation states that when an agency receives after award a size determination that the awardee is not an eligible small business, and no appeal is made to the Small Business Administration (“SBA”) Office of Hearings & Appeals (“OHA”), then the agency must terminate the award. However, if a timely OHA appeal is filed and OHA affirms the size determination finding the awardee ineligible, the agency must either “terminate the contract or not exercise the next option.”


After the agency had issued the task order to Apogee, the SBA area office found it not small. But Apogee timely appealed to OHA, which affirmed the area office size determination. By doing this, the regulations permitted the agency to do one of two things:


· Terminate the task order issued to Apogee or

· Continue with Apogee’s performance, but not issue the next option on the task order.


In this case, the agency chose not to terminate the contract, which was an action explicitly allowed under the regulations (though the agency couldn’t issue the next option).


Takeaway: If a contractor receives an award, but is found to be “not small” the contractor may appeal to OHA (assuming it has grounds for such an appeal). Even if OHA affirms the size determination finding the contractor “not small,” the agency may elect not to terminate the contract but would be prohibited from exercising the next option.


For other helpful suggestions on government contracting, visit:

Richard D. Lieberman’s FAR Consulting & Training at https://www.richarddlieberman.com/, and Mistakes in Government Contracting at https://richarddlieberman.wixsite.com/mistakes.




11 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Asserting Duress in Signing a Modification

Sand Point Services, LLC brought two claims before the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals, both involving modifications.  Sand Point Servs., LLC, ASBCA Nos. 61819, 61820, January 4, 2024.  The f

Requirements Contracts: Words of Exclusivity

The Federal Circuit recently clarified that an agency’s contract may still contain requisite language to make it a requirements contract, even if the contract does not include the required Federal Acq

The website of Richard Donald Lieberman, a government contracts consultant and retired attorney who is the author of both "The 100 Worst Mistakes in Government Contracting" (with Jason Morgan) and "The 100 Worst Government Mistakes in Government Contracting." Richard Lieberman concentrates on Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) consulting and training, including  commercial item contracting (FAR Part 12), compliance with proposal requirements (FAR Part 15 negotiated procurement), sealed bidding (FAR Part 14), compliance with solicitation requirements, contract administration (FAR Part 42), contract modifications and changes (FAR Part 43), subcontracting and flowdown requirements (FAR Part 44), government property (FAR Part 45), quality assurance (FAR Part 46), obtaining invoiced payments owed to contractors,  and other compliance with the FAR. Mr.Lieberman is also involved in numerous community service activities.  See LinkedIn profile at https://www.linkedin.com/in/richard-d-lieberman-3a25257a/.This website and blog are for educational and information purposes only.  Nothing posted on this website constitutes legal advice, which can only be obtained from a qualified attorney. Website Owner/Consultant does not engage in the practice of law and will not provide legal advice or legal services based on competence and standing in the law. Legal filings and other aspects of a legal practice must be performed by an appropriate attorney. Using this website does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Although the author strives to present accurate information, the information provided on this site is not guaranteed to be complete, correct or up-to-date.  The views expressed on this blog are solely those of the author. FAR Consulting & Training, Bethesda, Maryland, Tel. 202-520-5780, rliebermanconsultant@gmail.com

Copyright © 2024 Richard D. Lieberman

bottom of page