top of page

GAO Bid Protest Activity in Fiscal Year 2024

Writer: R.D. Lieberman,ConsultantR.D. Lieberman,Consultant

The Government Accountability Office (“GAO”) released its annual bid protest report to the Congress for fiscal year on November 14, 2024 (B-158766). The GAO actually received 1803 protests in fiscal year (“FY”) 2024 but dismissed or immediately denied or dismissed a substantial number of them, while actually considering and issuing decisions on 387 protests, known as “merit decisions.”  Although this was an 11% decrease from 2023, the 2023 numbers were affected by more than 120 multiple protests in three protests.  The number of protests was similar to the average of the prior three years (FY 2021-2024).

The GAO sustain rate increased slightly from 14 percent in FY 2023 to 16 percent in FY 2024. These figures were adjusted to remove 119 duplicate (multiple) protests and B-numbers in two protests--Systems Plus, Inc. et al, B-419956, June 29, 2023 and Phoenix Data Security, Inc. et al, B-419956.200 et al, July 10, 2023. GAO’s two year average sustain rate in FY 2023-2024 was 15 percent. This rate is comparable to prior years.


The other key GAO bid protest statistics for fiscal years 2019-24 were as follows:


GAO Bid Protest Statistics for Fiscal Years 2020-2024

 

FY2019

FY 2020

FY 2021

FY 2022

FY 2023 adjusted

FY 2024

Merit decisions

587

545

581

455

489

387

Sustained

77

84

85

59

69

61

Sustain rate

13%

15%

15%

13%

14%

16%

Effectiveness rate

44%

51%

48%

51%

57%

52%

Alternative  Dispute Resolution (ADR) cases

40

124

76

74

69

76

ADR success rate

90%

82%

84%

92%

90%

92%

Hearings

2% (21 cases)

1%

 (9 cases)

1% (13cases)

0.27%

(2 cases)

2%

(22 cases)

.2%

(1 case)

 


The “effectiveness rate” declined somewhat, from about 57 percent in 2023 to 52 percent in 2024. These are protests where the protester obtained some form of relief from the agency, either as a result of voluntary agency corrective action or the protest being sustained.

 

The percentage of cases where the GAO conducted a hearing remained small—generally only 1 or 2 percent of the cases.


GAO also reported that there was one instance where a federal agency did not fully implement a recommendation made by the GAO. The State department asserted that there was a conflict between the Omnibus Diplomatic Security and Antiterrorism Act of 1986 and regulations published by the Department regarding the SAM registration Act.  The GAO recommended that Congress resolve this alleged conflict.  Also, during 2024, the GAO issued final decisions within 100 days after all protests that were submitted, as required by the Competition in Contracting Act, 31 USC § 3554(e)(2).


Finally, the GAO reported on the most prevalent reasons for sustaining protests that were actually resolved on the merits in FY 2024. These were:


1. Unreasonable technical evaluation

2. Flawed selection decision

3. Unreasonable cost or price evaluation


The GAO also noted that a significant number of protests it received did not reach a decision on the merits because agencies voluntarily took corrective action rather than defend the protest on the merits. Agencies need not and do not report any of the many reasons they decide to take voluntary corrective actions.


For other helpful suggestions on government contracting, visit:

Richard D. Lieberman’s FAR Consulting & Training at https://www.richarddlieberman.com/, and Mistakes in Government Contracting at https://richarddlieberman.wixsite.com/mistakes.


 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All

Invalid "Final Decision"

Does the absence of a required claim render a Contracting Officer’s (“CO”) “final” decision invalid?.  The answer is simple, such a...

Comments


The website of Richard Donald Lieberman, a government contracts consultant and retired attorney who is the author of both "The 100 Worst Mistakes in Government Contracting" (with Jason Morgan) and "The 100 Worst Government Mistakes in Government Contracting." Richard Lieberman concentrates on Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) consulting and training, including  commercial item contracting (FAR Part 12), compliance with proposal requirements (FAR Part 15 negotiated procurement), sealed bidding (FAR Part 14), compliance with solicitation requirements, contract administration (FAR Part 42), contract modifications and changes (FAR Part 43), subcontracting and flowdown requirements (FAR Part 44), government property (FAR Part 45), quality assurance (FAR Part 46), obtaining invoiced payments owed to contractors,  and other compliance with the FAR. Mr.Lieberman is also involved in numerous community service activities.  See LinkedIn profile at https://www.linkedin.com/in/richard-d-lieberman-3a25257a/.This website and blog are for educational and information purposes only.  Nothing posted on this website constitutes legal advice, which can only be obtained from a qualified attorney. Website Owner/Consultant does not engage in the practice of law and will not provide legal advice or legal services based on competence and standing in the law. Legal filings and other aspects of a legal practice must be performed by an appropriate attorney. Using this website does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Although the author strives to present accurate information, the information provided on this site is not guaranteed to be complete, correct or up-to-date.  The views expressed on this blog are solely those of the author. FAR Consulting & Training, Bethesda, Maryland, Tel. 202-520-5780, rliebermanconsultant@gmail.com

Copyright © 2024 Richard D. Lieberman

bottom of page