top of page

RICHARD D. LIEBERMAN'S FAR CONSULTING & TRAINING
News and Blogs for Government Contractors
by Richard D. Lieberman, Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Consultant
Government Contracting Blog
(See also the articles page of this site)
What A Blanket Purchase Agreement Is NOT
The Navy issued a solicitation for a Blanket Purchase Agreement (“BPA”) for accepting and filling orders placed by the Navy for parts for maintenance, repair and operations of ship stores, including their operation, with the contractor’s own labor,. The solicitation stated that services/products can be ordered under this BPA,” and also stated that “This BPA does not obligate any funds [but can] be obligated by placement of calls under Federal Acquisition Regulation (“FAR”) S
R.D. Lieberman,Consultant
2 days ago4 min read
Holidays Count
US Pan American Solutions (“US Pan”) moved for reconsideration of the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (“Board”) decision dated April 25, 2025 ( US Pan Am. Sols.,LLC, ASBCA No. 63957, 25-1 BCA ¶ 38,814) where the Board dismissed its appeal for lack of jurisdiction as untimely filed. US Pan Am. Sols ., ASBCA 63957, August 18, 2025. The appeal was filed 91 days. US Pan contends that its appeal was filed 91 days after the final decision of the contracting officer, but t
R.D. Lieberman,Consultant
2 days ago2 min read
Clarifying Government Accountability Office Pleading Standards
Consider the following statements from the Government Accountability Office (“GAO”) Warfighter Focused Logistics, Inc., B-43546 and B-423456.2, August 5, 2025 decision, with particular attention to the highlighted sentences (references are omitted). The GAO has now clarified its pleading standards as follows: [Protester, Warfighter Focused Logistics, or “WFL”] contends that the agency's evaluation of VMP's quotation was unreasonable. Specifically, the protester alleges VMP [
R.D. Lieberman,Consultant
2 days ago3 min read
Implied in Fact Contracts-Unjust Enrichment and Quantum Meruit
If you were a health care contractor providing emergency room health care services to a rural hospital, and your government contract ended, would you continue to provide those services despite the fact that the Contracting Officer refused to pay more than $8 million for your submitted and undisputed invoices over a period of 7 months? Tribal Health, LLC (“Tribal”) did so at the Pine Ridge Indian Hospital in order to ensure continued emergency room services because it was the
R.D. Lieberman,Consultant
2 days ago5 min read
Are "Pocket Rescissions" of Funds for Government Contracts and Other Government Expenditures Lawful?
Can the President (normally through the Office of Management and Budget—"OMB”) use a pocket rescission in order to withhold budget authority (funding) for government contracts and other government expenditures without Congressional consideration of a rescission proposal? The Government Accountability Office (“GAO”) says this procedure is unlawful, however, to date, the Supreme Court has allowed it to happen in the Trump administration, albeit only with an Emergency Ruling th
R.D. Lieberman,Consultant
Feb 156 min read
No Contract Based On No Acceptance of Purchase Order
Once again, a manufacturer ran afoul of Part 13 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation by failing to understand how purchase orders operate in federal procurement. Warfighter Defense, Inc., ASBCA No. 63924, July 16, 2025. Warfighter failed to understand that its actions in failing to accept a purchase order (“PO”) from the Defense Logistics Agency (“DLA”), either in writing or by substantial performance, meant that there was no contract between the company and DLA, and no r
R.D. Lieberman,Consultant
Feb 24 min read
A Cost Plus Fixed Fee Contract Does Not Guarantee the Profit on Full Estimate of Work, If The Work is Not Fully Performed
In a cost-plus fixed fee contract, where the Agency’s actual requirements are substantially lower than the Agency’s initial estimated hours, is the contractor entitled to its full fee? This issue was recently explored in an Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (“Board”) case, Vectrus Sys. Corp ., ASBCA Nos. 62685, 62949. Vectrus contended that its fixed fee represents the agreed-upon profit, but the Agency alleged that it was only obligated to pay for actual contractor
R.D. Lieberman,Consultant
Feb 23 min read
The ASBCA Comes Down Hard on Misuse of Artificial Intelligence in a Brief
This blog recently discussed the danger of using Artificial Intelligence (“AI”) improperly to write briefs and pleadings at the Government Accountability Office (“GAO”). See “ The Danger of Using Artificial Intelligence Improperly ,”| Oct 13, 2025, which demonstrated how the GAO was sanctioning attorneys who misused AI. Now comes the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals ("ASBCA" or “Board”) which criticized a brief that “hallucinated” fictitious cases and imposed sanctio
R.D. Lieberman,Consultant
Feb 23 min read
bottom of page